I enjoy the freedom of the blog format. It allows me to do a bit more than I can when
I’m limited to 300 words in the Form. I
also get to throw in commentary, disclaimers and the like which are frowned
upon in national publications. And
rightly so, I might hastily add. So with
commentary, disclaimers and hedging – since all the facts are decidedly NOT in;
here is the latest at the Minnesota Racing Commission.
Additional information is emerging on the investigations
being conducted by the state into two Commission officials, Assistant Executive
Director Mary Manney and Chief State Veterinarian Dr. Lynn Hovda. Information is still sketchy and, for the
most part, only one side of each story has been made public so it is difficult
to come to a consensus on what exactly occurred in each incident.
The most important bit of
information for the wagering (and racing) public is that neither investigation
pertains to the integrity of racing or wagering at the two Minnesota tracks and
their card clubs.
Mary Manney was placed on paid
administrative leave on September 7, 2012 pending an investigation of alleged
insubordination. According to her
attorney, Sheila Englemeier, the allegations are “completely false. When my client was put out of work she was
sent a letter promising a fair and thorough investigation and yet still has not
been talked to about the issue.”
Englemeier also questioned the
timing of the leave saying that prior to her client being placed on
administrative leave she presented several oral complaints of MRC Commission
Chairman Jesse Overton’s bullying behavior toward woman. On October 4, Manney filed a formal sexual
discrimination complaint with the MRC.
“My client has a right to due
process,” said Englemeier. “And the
process so far has made her look like a criminal. We will give the state of Minnesota a chance
to do the right thing. My client would
like to get back to work. She is ready to
roll up her sleeves and work hard.”
In response, Chairman Overton
said, “I am confused by this attack on my professional reputation by Mary
Manney’s attorney. I will respond at the appropriate time. I have every confidence that I will have an
opportunity – and the public deserves to know – all of the facts surrounding
this case and Jesse Overton.”
Through her attorney, Roberta
Brackman, Dr. Hovda issued a statement regarding her investigation because she
felt it was time for her version (remember – we only have one side here) of
events to come to light rather than being defined by “simply a damning single
headline.”
On July 4, with temperature
skyrocketing past 100 degrees in Minnesota and racing cancelled due to extreme
heat, four horses shipped in from Texas with their trailer on top of a flatbed truck. The horses were in distress and Hovda was
contacted by track staff while they tried to determine a way to unload the
animals.
According to the statement,
Hovda, in consultation with another vet and the Executive Director of the MRC,
Richard Krueger, proceeded to provide aid, including banamine injections, with
the permission of the accompanying groom. The horses were eventually unloaded
safely by the Canterbury staff and the horses treated by the trainer’s
veterinarian.
After the owner and trainer
complained to the MRC, an investigation was conducted by the Minnesota
Management and Budget Office through an outside investigator. In her statement, Brackman concludes:
“The bottom line is this – Dr.
Hovda did her job and did it well, saving four horses from possible injury or
death. Her actions are supported by numerous experts in the field. And yet, the Commission has permitted this
ordeal to linger more than a month since the fact-finding was complete.”
How long the outside
investigator had to file his report is not known and may have a bearing on why
this has taken so long to get resolved.
Additionally, without the contents of the complaint it is difficult to
determine the particulars. It is known that
Dr. Hovda administered banamine, an equine analgesic, to help mitigate the
symptoms of distress. Horses cannot run
with more than just a trace amount (20 nanograms of the substance or
metabolite(s) thereof per milliliter of blood plasma or serum) of the drug in
their system and, according to some experts, could take up to 45-days to reach
that level, effectively relegating them to one start for the remainder of the
meet. Were there other options available
that maybe would have allowed the horses to run sooner? That I don’t know - I’m not a vet. But shipping 4 animals the width of the
country to race is not cheap and there was certainly no way to recoup that with
only one start.
The previous day, at the
regularly scheduled meeting of the MRC, Overton had an on-air conflict with
KTSP reporter Jay Kolls as Kolls repeatedly asked Overton to comment on the
integrity of racing in Minnesota stating, “That is a fair question for the public,
isn’t it?”
Not to be an Overton defender,
but on this point one thing is clear – if Kolls bothered to pick up a Star-Tribune
he would have known that the crux of the investigations had to do with
treatment of allegedly heat exhausted horses and alleged insubordination and
absolutely zero to do with the protection of the public as far as fair races
and the integrity of gambling is concerned.
My guess? People will tune in to watch about shady gambling but not a
story of basic government investigations.
Overton was not far wrong when he said that Kolls should do some real
investigative reporting and that there is “no cloud over anything in Minnesota
over racing” – the racing product is secure and to repeatedly insinuate that
it’s not is misleading at best.
A lot of folks are looking to
pass judgment one way or another. I
think it’s clear that we have not heard all sides of all equations and the real
question is: when will we? If, as Dr.
Hovda’s statement says, her investigation was deemed over on September 10th,
how is there no resolution on October 20th? That’s an exceedingly long time to write up
your findings. As for Manney, she was
placed on administrative leave on September 7 and says that she still does not
know the actions that caused the action by the Commission. Shouldn’t the wheels of even a bureaucracy move
a bit quicker than this - especially when someone’s livelihood and reputation
are on the line? As for the allegations
against Chairman Overton, when does he have his day or does that have to wait
until after the holidays?
Minnesota racing has never
looked better than it does right now – the last thing it needs at this moment
is bureaucratic scandal to taint the progress being made on the racetrack.
2 comments:
What "expert" said that banamine can be found at levels that couldnt be raced on for 45 days? That is a so far wrong that it is scary. Banamine has a 48 hour withdrawl period in virtually every state.
Thanks for reading and taking the time to comment, Charles! I had no less than 3 people - owners, breeders and farm owners - tell me that about Banamine. Interestingly, this further begs the question: if she saved the horses lives AND didn't compromise their ability to race, why would a complaint be filed? I guess I could understand if they couldn't race and there was a better alternative, but under your scenario, all ended pretty well. More questions than answers...
Post a Comment